Core Discrepancy
This page argues that later skeptical summaries of Bimini Road cores diverged from details in earlier published descriptions.
In the 1978 Sea Frontiers article, Eugene (Gene) Shinn reported coring results from two areas totaling 17 cores. The text described one area where bedding was not readily visible and another where bedding was either horizontal or dipping.
FEWER THAN 25% were described as dipping toward the sea.
Later summaries (including a 1980 Nature article and a 2004 Skeptical Inquirer article) were interpreted here as presenting stronger uniformity claims than the 1978 wording appears to support.
Single-Layer vs Multi-Layer Stones
One skeptical assertion held that the Bimini formation rested as a single layer over sand or bedrock. This page counters that photographic evidence shows stacked and tiered stones in multiple areas.
1978 photo (Dr. David Zink) showing one Bimini Road block resting atop another.
Primary Source Downloads
Reference excerpts are linked here for direct review.
Additional Skeptical Claims Addressed
-
No prop or leveling stones exist under slabs.
Findings presented here report support stones removed from beneath larger blocks.
Support stone removed from beneath a large Bimini Road block.
Wedge stone recovered from under a large block.
- No ancient artifacts or tool marks are present. This page cites reports of mortise-and-tenon stones, carved features, and multiple stone anchors with drilled holes or rope-groove patterns.
- All stones are natural beachrock. Counter-claims here argue that not all stones match beachrock and note that beachrock itself was commonly used in ancient harbor construction.
Triangular polished slab reported north of Bimini (2007 field account).
Conclusion: This page maintains that the Bimini Road and proximal sites show enough maritime-culture indicators to justify continued field research.